Project authors and project funding details
Project Leader
Duncan Nulty
Associate Professor Duncan Nulty is internationally recognised for expertise in: institutional policy and practice in the assessment of student learning; academic standards; curriculum design; and the evaluation of educational programs (including student evaluation). He has led, co-led or been a team member on learning and teaching development grants with total funding exceeding $1 million, including two national and one international grant.
Co-Lead
Alison Owens
Associate Professor Alison Owens is the Academic Lead: Scholarship and Professional Learning in the Centre for Education and Innovation at the Australian Catholic University and an adjunct Associate Professor (Education) at Central Queensland University. She holds dual PhDs (Education and also Creative Arts) and has over twenty-five years university teaching experience. Alison regularly researches and publishes on topics relevant to higher education practice, particularly culturally inclusive teaching and learning, doctoral training, creative arts research and academic development.
Project funding and support
This project was jointly funded by a generous competitive grant provided by The Council of Australasian University Leaders in Learning and Teaching – CAULLT, and by substantial “in-kind” contributions from Australian Catholic University, where both project leaders are based.
The Council of Australasian University Leaders in Learning and Teaching (CAULLT) is the peak professional body for Australasian leaders in university learning and teaching whose responsibilities include academic development. It seeks to enhance its members' capacity to be key strategic leaders and advisers in learning and teaching.
ACU stands for meaningful education, rewarding research, and life-changing community engagement. Its mission and values form the core of who and what it is as a Catholic organisation. Read more about the institution and the values that inform its actions starting here with a message from its Vice-Chancellor: Impact through Empathy
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was obtained to undertake the research forming the base of this project.
Ethics Register Number: 2020-18E
Project Title: A values-framework and self-assessment tool to improve tertiary academic leadership
Copyright and Disclaimer
Copyright: All material appearing on the VBLinHE website is copyright. You may not copy, reproduce, distribute, publish, display, perform, modify, create derivative works, transmit, or in any way exploit any of this material, nor may you distribute any part of this material over any network, including a local area network, sell or offer it for sale, or use such content to construct any kind of database. You may not alter or remove any copyright or other notice from copies of the material on the VBLinHE website. Copying or storing any material from the VBLinHE website is expressly prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. For permission to use the material on the VBLinHE website, please contact the authors.
Disclaimer: The content contained in the VBLinHE website is provided only for educational and informational purposes. The Authors attempt to ensure that content is accurate and obtained from reliable sources, but do not represent it to be error-free. The authors may add, amend or remove any part of this web site at any time for any reason without notice, and failure to do so in a timely way shall not be construed as negligence. There is no warranty, explicit or implied, that any functions on the VBLinHE website will be uninterrupted, that defects will be corrected, or that the website will be free from viruses or other harmful components. Any links to third party information on the VBLinHE website are provided as a courtesy and do not constitute an endorsement of those materials or the third party providing them. The scenarios represented on this website are fictitious compositions based on multiple comparable scenarios. Thus, while these scenarios may bear similarity to real scenarios, they do not purport to reflect specific actual events, people or institutions. Therefore similarity to specific events, people or institutions is coincidental.